This site is being phased out.
Difference between revisions of "Peter Saveliev"
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
They are sold on Amazon: | They are sold on Amazon: | ||
− | [[image:front cover.png|x150px|link=http://www.amazon.com/dp/1495188752]] $\ $ [[image:Calculus Illustrated v1.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B082WKCYHY]] $\ $ [[image:Calculus Illustrated v2.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0848P8WKF]] $\ $ [[image:Calculus Illustrated v3.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08BQXW9XJ]] $\ $ [[image:HSCcover.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CCHRHFC]] $\ $ [[image:LAcover.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CL4H9M2]] | + | [[image:front cover.png|x150px|link=http://www.amazon.com/dp/1495188752]] $\ $ [[image:Calculus Illustrated v1.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B082WKCYHY]] $\ $ [[image:Calculus Illustrated v2.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0848P8WKF]] $\ $ [[image:Calculus Illustrated v3.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08BQXW9XJ]] $\ $ [[image:HSCcover.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CCHRHFC]] $\ $ [[image:LAcover.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CL4H9M2]]$\ $[[image:v4.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08FGQFXMX/]] $\ $ [[image:v5.png|x150px|link=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08FJH5XLS]] |
− | $\ $[[image:v4.png|x150px|]] $\ $ [[image:v5.png|x150px| | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 34: | Line 26: | ||
Such a symmetry is supposed to be an involution of the $3$-space, $A^2=I$; therefore, its diagonalized matrix has only $\pm 1$ on the diagonal. These are the three cases: | Such a symmetry is supposed to be an involution of the $3$-space, $A^2=I$; therefore, its diagonalized matrix has only $\pm 1$ on the diagonal. These are the three cases: | ||
− | + | #(a) One $\ -1$: mirror symmetry. But then pen draws pen. No! | |
− | + | #(b) Two $\ -1$'s: $180$ degrees rotation. But then we have two right (or two left) hands. No! | |
− | + | #(c) Three $\ -1$'s: central symmetry. Yes! | |
+ | * - Why is discrete calculus better than infinitesimal calculus? - Why? - Because it can be integer-valued! - And? - And the integer-valued calculus can detect if our universe is non-orientable! Read [[Integer-valued calculus]], an essay that makes a case for discrete calculus by appealing to topology and physics. | ||
− | + | [[image:mirror image of man.png| center]] | |
− | + | * So, what would mathematics look like without fractions? | |
* - The political “spectrum” might be a circle! - So? - Then there can be no fair decision-making system! Read [[The political spectrum is a circle]], an essay based on the very last section of the topology book. | * - The political “spectrum” might be a circle! - So? - Then there can be no fair decision-making system! Read [[The political spectrum is a circle]], an essay based on the very last section of the topology book. | ||
Line 48: | Line 41: | ||
− | |||
*[mailto:saveliev@marshall.edu Email] | *[mailto:saveliev@marshall.edu Email] | ||
− | *[https://twitter.com/PeterSaveliev Twitter] | + | *[https://twitter.com/PeterSaveliev Twitter] |
[[category: Mathematics]] | [[category: Mathematics]] |
Revision as of 15:05, 25 June 2021
Hello! My name is Peter Saveliev (rhymes with “leave”). I am a professor of mathematics at Marshall University, Huntington WV, USA.
Books:
- Topology Illustrated
- Calculus Illustrated
- Volume 1 Precalculus
- Volume 2 Differential Calculus
- Volume 3 Integral Calculus
- Volume 4 Calculus in Higher Dimensions
- Volume 5 Differential Equations
- How Swords Cut
- Linear Algebra Illustrated
- Elementary Discrete Calculus: How far we can go without limits? For now, I just picked 3 chapters from the first 3 volumes of Calculus Illustrated. PDF
$$\lim_{\Delta x\to 0}\left( \begin{array}{cc}\text{ discrete }\\ \text{ calculus }\end{array} \right)= \text{ calculus }$$
They are sold on Amazon:
$\ $ $\ $ $\ $ $\ $ $\ $ $\ $ $\ $
- Once upon a time, I took a better look at the poster of Drawing Hands by Escher hanging in my office and realized that what is shown isn't symmetric! To fix the problem I made my own picture called Painting Hands:
Such a symmetry is supposed to be an involution of the $3$-space, $A^2=I$; therefore, its diagonalized matrix has only $\pm 1$ on the diagonal. These are the three cases:
- (a) One $\ -1$: mirror symmetry. But then pen draws pen. No!
- (b) Two $\ -1$'s: $180$ degrees rotation. But then we have two right (or two left) hands. No!
- (c) Three $\ -1$'s: central symmetry. Yes!
- - Why is discrete calculus better than infinitesimal calculus? - Why? - Because it can be integer-valued! - And? - And the integer-valued calculus can detect if our universe is non-orientable! Read Integer-valued calculus, an essay that makes a case for discrete calculus by appealing to topology and physics.
- So, what would mathematics look like without fractions?
- - The political “spectrum” might be a circle! - So? - Then there can be no fair decision-making system! Read The political spectrum is a circle, an essay based on the very last section of the topology book.